Horror and terror: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
fixed layout of infobox and added image
Changed the publication date in reference "12. R Solomon, In Defence of Sentimentality" from the incorrect "(200)" to the correct "(2004)"; See https://global.oup.com/academic/product/in-defense-of-sentimentality-9780195145502?cc=no&lang=en&
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{short description|Standard literary and psychological concept applied especially to Gothic literature and film}}
[[File:Sir Charles Bell, Essays on Expression Wellcome L0021920.jpg|thumb|250x250px262px|Drawing by [[Sir Charles Bell]] of a terrified man from ''Essays on Expression''.]]
 
{{Emotion}}
The distinction between '''horror''' and '''terror''' is a standard literary and psychological concept applied especially to [[Gothic fiction|Gothic]] and [[horror fiction]].<ref>Radcliffe 1826; Varma 1966; Crawford 1986: 101-3; Bruhm 1994: 37; Wright 2007: 35-56.</ref> ''TerrorHorror'' is usually described as the feeling of dreadrevulsion andthat anticipationusually thatfollows ''precedes''a thefrightening horrifyingsight, sound, or otherwise experience. By contrast, ''horrorterror'' is usually described as the feeling of revulsiondread thatand usuallyanticipation that ''followsprecedes'' athe frightening sight, sound, or otherwisehorrifying experience.
[[File:Sir Charles Bell, Essays on Expression Wellcome L0021920.jpg|thumb|250x250px|Drawing by [[Sir Charles Bell]] of a terrified man from ''Essays on Expression''.]]
The distinction between '''horror and terror''' is a standard literary and psychological concept applied especially to [[Gothic fiction|Gothic]] and [[horror fiction]].<ref>Radcliffe 1826; Varma 1966; Crawford 1986: 101-3; Bruhm 1994: 37; Wright 2007: 35-56.</ref> ''Terror'' is usually described as the feeling of dread and anticipation that ''precedes'' the horrifying experience. By contrast, ''horror'' is the feeling of revulsion that usually ''follows'' a frightening sight, sound, or otherwise experience.
 
Horror[[Noël hasCarroll]] also been defined by [[Noel Carroll]]terror as a combination of terrorhorror and revulsion.<ref>M Hills, ''The Pleasures of Horror'' (2005) p. 17</ref>
 
==Literary Gothic==
The distinction between terror and horror was first characterized by the [[Gothic fiction|Gothic]] writer [[Ann Radcliffe]] (1764&ndash;1823), horror being more related to being shocked or scared (being horrified) at an awful realization or a deeply unpleasant occurrence, while terror is more related to being anxious or fearful.<ref>Varma 1966.</ref> Radcliffe considered that terror is characterized by "obscurity" or indeterminacy in its treatment of potentially horrible events, something which leads to the [[Sublime (philosophy)|sublime]]. She says in thean essay published posthumously in 1826, 'On the Supernatural in Poetry', that itterror "expands the soul and awakens the faculties to a high degree of life". Horror, in contrast, "freezes and nearly annihilates them" with its unambiguous displays of atrocity. She goes on: "I apprehend that neither [[Shakespeare]] nor [[John Milton|Milton]] by their fictions, nor [[Edmund Burke|Mr Burke]] by [[A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful|his reasoning]], anywhere looked to positive horror as a source of the sublime, though they all agree that terror is a very high one; and where lies the great difference between horror and terror, but in uncertainty and obscurity, that accompany the first, respecting the dreader evil."<ref>Radcliffe: 1826.</ref>
 
 
[[File:Expression of the Emotions Figure 20.png|thumb|250px|upright|right|Figure 20 from [[Charles Darwin]]'s ''[[The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals]]'' (1872). Caption reads "FIG. 20.&mdash;Terror, from a photograph by Dr. Duchenne."]]
 
The distinction between terror and horror was first characterized by the [[Gothic fiction|Gothic]] writer [[Ann Radcliffe]] (1764&ndash;1823), horror being more related to being shocked or scared (being horrified) at an awful realization or a deeply unpleasant occurrence, while terror is more related to being anxious or fearful.<ref>Varma 1966.</ref> Radcliffe considered that terror is characterized by "obscurity" or indeterminacy in its treatment of potentially horrible events, something which leads to the [[Sublime (philosophy)|sublime]]. She says in the essay that it "expands the soul and awakens the faculties to a high degree of life". Horror, in contrast, "freezes and nearly annihilates them" with its unambiguous displays of atrocity. She goes on: "I apprehend that neither [[Shakespeare]] nor [[John Milton|Milton]] by their fictions, nor [[Edmund Burke|Mr Burke]] by [[A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful|his reasoning]], anywhere looked to positive horror as a source of the sublime, though they all agree that terror is a very high one; and where lies the great difference between horror and terror, but in uncertainty and obscurity, that accompany the first, respecting the dreader evil."<ref>Radcliffe: 1826.</ref>
 
 
 
 
 
...Beautiful|his reasoning]], anywhere looked to positive horror as a source of the sublime, though they all agree that terror is a very high one; and where lies the great difference between horror and terror, but in uncertainty and obscurity, that accompany the first, respecting the dreader evil."<ref>Radcliffe: 1826.</ref>
 
According to [[Devendra Varma]] in ''The Gothic Flame'' (1966):
Line 27 ⟶ 34:
 
==Psychoanalytic views==
[[Freud]] likened the experience of horror to that of the [[uncanny]].<ref>S Freud, The “Uncanny” ''Imago'' V 1919 p. 27</ref>
 
In his wake, [[Georges Bataille]] saw horror as akin to [[ecstasy (philosophy)|ecstasy]] in its transcendence of the everyday;<ref>E Roudinesco, ''Jacques Lacan'' (Cambridge 1999) p. 122 and p. 131</ref> as opening a way to [[Limit-experience|go beyond]] rational social consciousness.<ref>W Paulett, ''G S Bataille'' (2015) p. 67 and p. 101</ref> [[Julia Kristeva]] in turn considered horror as evoking experience of the primitive, the infantile, and the demoniacal aspects of unmediated femininity.<ref>J Kristeva, ''Powers of Horror'' (New York 1981) p. 63-5</ref>
 
==Horror, helplessness and trauma==
The paradox of pleasure experienced through horror films/books can be explained partly as stemming from relief from real-life horror in the experience of horror in play, partly as a safe way to return in adult life to the paralysing feelings of infantile helplessness.<ref>R Solomon, ''In Defence of Sentimentality'' (2002004) p. 108-113</ref>
 
Helplessness is also a factor in the overwhelming experience of real horror in [[psychological trauma]].<ref>D Goleman, ''Emotional Intelligence'' (London 1996) p. 203-4</ref> Playing at re-experiencing the trauma may be a helpful way of overcoming it.<ref>O Fenichel, ''The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis'' (London 1946) p. 542-3</ref>
 
== See also ==
{{Wikiquote|Horror}}
{{Wikiquote|Terror}}
{{Columns-list|
* [[Fantastic art]]
Line 52 ⟶ 57:
 
== Bibliography ==
{{Wikiquote|Horror}}
{{Wikiquote|Terror}}
*Steven Bruhm (1994) ''Gothic Bodies: The Politics of Pain in Romantic Fiction''. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
*Gary Crawford (1986) "Criticism" in J. Sullivan (ed) ''The Penguin Encyclopedia of Horror and the Supernatural''.
Line 58 ⟶ 65:
*Gina Wisker (2005) ''Horror Fiction: An Introduction''. New York: Continuum.
*Angela Wright (2007) ''Gothic Fiction''. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
*Julian Hanich (2010) ''Cinematic Emotion in Horror Films and Thrillers. The Aesthetic Paradox of Pleasurable Fear''. New York: [[Routledge]].
*[[Noël Carroll]] (1990) ''The Philosophy of Horror: Or, Paradoxes of the Heart''. New York: Routledge.
 
{{emotion-footer}}
{{Authority control}}
 
[[Category:Fear]]
[[Category:Literary concepts]]
[[Category:Conceptual distinctions]]