Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren wills
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 21:49, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Darren wills (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable "author". Lacks reliable sources. Pontificalibus (talk) 17:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- kelapstick (talk) 17:46, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:BIO / WP:AUTHOR / WP:ACADEMIC. Once contributing to an exam crammer is not enough I'm afraid. Nancy talk 17:47, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. At the very most, he qualifies for a credit in an article this book, should that one meet notability. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One study guide and a U2 concert review that cannot be found does not an author make. Wperdue (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]
- Delete --Clearly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - obviously non-notable. ╟─TreasuryTag►contribs─╢ 16:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.